I wonder if Michael could comment on the optimization of those
constructs: Would the <xls:if> be faster to execute than the XPath?
Saxon will generate identical code for all three cases.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
Just curious...
(Obviously one should always profile before optimization, but
Dr. Kay is well informed to comment...)
- --
==============
+----------------------------------------------+
Martin Gadbois | "Windows might take you from 0 to 60
faster, |
S/W Developer | but to go to 100 you need Unix."
|
Colubris Networks Inc.
+----------------------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEa0II9Y3/iTTCEDkRAmYJAJ0f5jwey2GOWz79A3EDiZiWPbm9hwCfckn4
un76rxXaqExznhnbUs8GVIU=
=LukS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--