What bothers me the most is when people skip over significant pieces
of my comments to try and make their point,
Initially, I was hoping to get some general "this is good/bad because of
this..." kind of thing that Karl provided <
You decided to skip over that part and pull out the pieces in front of
and after this to try and suggest something that wasn't the case.
Why?
On 6/3/06, Dennis Barb <dennisxmlwork(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com> wrote:
At 12:06 PM -0600 6/3/06, M. David Peterson wrote:
>I have been spending countless hours ...
>I have been developing ..
>I have been working directly with Dr. Kay ...
>The "some people" he is refering to is me ...
>I have an open dialogue with Brian Jones ...
>My question, while not really quite this direct, was
meant
>to (hopefully) suggest to those who have interest in
this kind
>of thing that a pretty significant opportunity exists
here...
>what I am attempting to help bring across here is
that opportunity
>exists for those of us with interest in
XML/XSLT/XSL-FO
So, you didn't really have a question at all. You
wanted to promote
yourself and push an agenda.
Right?
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--
<M:D/>
M. David Peterson
http://www.xsltblog.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--