Thanks . I'll take the time to digest it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin(_at_)colina(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
To: <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?
"Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey(_dot_)zellmann(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net>
writes:
Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so
Tracey> important and so difficult for me.
Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and
Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy? Those made a lot of
Tracey> sense to me.
Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement
Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not
Tracey> necessary.)
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--