xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?

2006-07-13 17:01:18
Thanks . I'll take the time to digest it.

----- Original Message ----- From: "Colin Paul Adams" <colin(_at_)colina(_dot_)demon(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>
To: <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [xsl] Re: Keeping a running total?


"Tracey" == Tracey Zellmann <tracey(_dot_)zellmann(_at_)comcast(_dot_)net> 
writes:

   Tracey> Myself - I am still struggling to decipher why this is so
   Tracey> important and so difficult for me.

   Tracey> For the declarative case, where is the Dijkstra paper, and
   Tracey> is there a spaghetti code analogy?  Those made a lot of
   Tracey> sense to me.

   Tracey> (Dijkstra wrote a seminal paper in 1968 "Go To Statement
   Tracey> Considered Harmful" which also proved that it was not
   Tracey> necessary.)

http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~rjmh/Papers/whyfp.html


--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--




--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--