Hey guys, thanks for all the answers. I supposed what I really want is
something like this:
function merge:
For each element in file1 and file2:
* If element available in both documents, output element and go
into that element in both documents, call merge()
* If element available in only one document, copy that element
and all it's subelements to the output
Thus combining two documents where the depth where they "seperate" isn't fixed.
Would that be possible with xslt?
Best Regards,
David
2006/7/17, Florent Georges <darkman_spam(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)fr>:
Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Hi
> <xsl:template match="*[not(*)]">
> <xsl:copy-of select="." />
> <xsl:copy-of select="$doc2//*[not(*)]" />
> </xsl:template>
With this template rue, you'll copy *all* leaves of the second
document after *each* leaf of the first one. The solution proposed by
Andrew does the right think IMHO.
Personally, I'd walk through the second tree in parallel with the
first one, by passing the current node in the second tree as a
parameter in xsl:apply-templates.
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Mail réinvente le mail ! Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail et son interface
révolutionnaire.
http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--