xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] more elegant way of doing this? (very simple)

2006-08-16 09:53:21

unless you really need to always use a node test 
AContribution rather than name()='AContribution'
It's namespace aware and likely more efficient.

Are you using xsl 1 or 2?

xpath 1:

sum(Records/Record/*[self::AContribution|self::BContribution|self::CContribution][number()=number()])

xpath2 you can do the same, or a bit more simply:

sum(Records/Record/(AContribution|BContribution|CContribution)[number()=number()])

David


--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>