At 2006-08-16 12:42 -0400, Steve wrote:
Summing up 3 specifically named nodes under Records/Record and summing
them only if they are numbers.
Current XSL===>
sum(Records/Record/*[name(.) = 'AContribution' and number(.) =
number(.) or name(.) = 'BContribution' and number(.) = number(.) or
name(.) = 'CContribution' and number(.) = number(.)])
The following would be more compact:
sum( ( Records/Record/AContribution | Records/Record/BContribution
| Records/Record/CContribution )[number(.)=number(.)] )
It is not namespace-safe to use name(.).
I'm just trying to reduce redundancy.
You don't say *where* you want to reduce
redundancy ... the above syntactically reduces
your expression ... I cannot comment on the speed
as that would be dependent on your processor so I
don't think the question can be answered in that way.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
UBL/XML/XSLT/XSL-FO training: Vårø, Denmark 06-09-25/10-06
World-wide corporate, govt. & user group UBL, XSL, & XML training.
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
Box 266, Kars, Ontario CANADA K0A-2E0 +1(613)489-0999 (F:-0995)
Male Cancer Awareness Aug'05 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--