hello.
i would be happy with a minimal conforming implementation in xslt 2.0,
meaning that only the element() scheme of xpointer would have to be
supported. i would doubt that supporting the xpointer() scheme is
something anybody would like to do, in particular since even xslt 2 does
not support the evaluation of dynamically generated xpaths (one of the
things i would have loved to see in xslt 2).
apart from that, i cannot imagine what the hard parts should be, but
maybe i am a bit to naive. anyway, i would be very happy to be pointed
to a list of potential problems before i get started.
thanks and cheers,
erik wilde tel:+1-510-6421464 - fax:+1-510-6425814
dret(_at_)sims(_dot_)berkeley(_dot_)edu - http://dret.net/netdret/
School of Information - UC Berkeley (ISchool/UCB)
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--