From memory, in mathematics taking one element from each class of
equivalence is called factorisation using this specific equivalence
relation.
So, we may call it "identity factorisation" -- can somebody offer
something better?
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
On 8/27/06, Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Do we have a good word for "take one from every group"?
Something like "unique ranking", or "sampling", or "full
representation" or shall I say "setification"?
On 8/27/06, M. David Peterson <m(_dot_)david(_at_)mdptws(_dot_)com> wrote:
> extended: where a 'key delegate' would represent a single instance of
> multiple occurence.
>
> M. David Peterson wrote:
> > keyed delegation
> >
> > Jay Bryant wrote:
> >> That's a tough one.
> >>
> >> streamline?
> >> unify?
> >> reduce?
> >> trim?
> >>
> >> None of those quite fits, though.
> >>
> >> English has a number of nouns for the basic concept, including
> >> "unique" and
> >> "distinct". However, I can't think of (or find online) a verb for that
> >> concept.
> >>
> >> FWIW (not much, I suspect)
> >>
> >> Jay Bryant
> >> Bryant Communication Services
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dimitre Novatchev"
> >> <dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
> >> To: <xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2006 7:41 PM
> >> Subject: [xsl] What is a better word for "de-duplication"?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> I want to use a single, short word to express the act of removing
> >>> duplicates from a node-set. I remember seing the word "de-duplication"
> >>> used, however it sounds ugly.
> >>>
> >>> Could someone suggest a better word, please?
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Dimitre Novatchev
> >>> ---------------------------------------
> >>> Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant
> >>> intelligence.
> >>> ---------------------------------------
> >>> To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
> >>>
> >>> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >>> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> >>> or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> >>> --~--
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> >> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> >> or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> >> --~--
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> /M:D
>
> M. David Peterson
> http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
>
>
> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> --~--
>
>
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--