cknell(_at_)onebox(_dot_)com wrote:
The process that works on this list is:
1) Describe the problem - Done
2) Provide a sample of the input - Waiting for this (a description is not the
same as a sample)
3) Provide a sample of the output - Waiting for this
4) Show us what you have so far - Done
Give us steps 2 and 3.
My sincere apologies for that I was not aware of the protocol.
Anyhow, after doing some testing out the following code
represents the changes that I made to get what I wanted.
The issue, I think, was more of cross-related between
xsl and formatting objects for the way I wanted it to appear.
I would be more than happy to explain (my ignorance)
what I was doing if anyone is interested.
Best,
Vijay
<xsl:for-each select="descendant::Feature">
<fo:block-container reference-orientation="90"
inline-progression-dimension.minimum="5mm"
inline-progression-dimension.optimum="5mm"
inline-progression-dimension.maximum="auto">
<fo:block>
<xsl:if test="Attribute">
<xsl:for-each select="Attribute">
<fo:block-container
reference-orientation="-90" inline-progression-dimension="35mm"
width="1.5in">
<fo:block font-size="6.5pt">
<xsl:value-of select="@value"/>
</fo:block>
</fo:block-container>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:if>
</fo:block>
</fo:block-container>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:for-each>
</xsl:template>
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--