It
should not matter to you whether the DOM you get actually
resides in
memory (completely) or on disk instead, other than for technical
reasons, like performance etc.
It matters a great deal! Most XSLT processors (like Saxon)
are limited in the size of document they can handle by the
available memory. For people who want to handle more than
200Mb or so (and lots people do) an XSLT processor that works
directly on a disk-based source document would be a real
boon. If they don't have that capability, then frankly,
there's not much point.
That is not what I meant, and yes I am convinced that processing over
200Mb is no more difficult than processing small documents with X-Hive
in the background.
Kind regards,
Geert
Drs. G.P.H. Josten
Consultant
Daidalos BV
Source of Innovation
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665 JZ Bleiswijk
Tel.: +31 (0) 10 850 1200
Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199
www.daidalos.nl
KvK 27164984
De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van
Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit
bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit
bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--