On 11/21/06, Florent Georges <darkman_spam(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)fr> wrote:
Dimitre Novatchev wrote:
Hi
> However, this seems like a waste of time, because there is
> already the dyn:evaluate() EXSLT extension function as
> well as saxon:evaluate().
> This means that probably there are not going to be users
> for an XPath parser written in XSLT.
Mmh, parsing is not evaluating. Thanks for example to
static analysis of a query, or some reporting. That said, I
don't know if it could be usefull.
The only real user requests for similar/related functionality I've
seen since years on this list is for dynamic evaluation of XPath
expressions.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--