xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] How to use generate-id() inside an xsl:function without a node available?

2007-02-28 02:45:39
On 2/28/07, Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com> wrote:
> I found that when using generate-id() with LREs, it creates
> increasing numbers, preceded by 'd'. When using source nodes,
> something else happens. I know from the specs, that an
> implementation can choose its own way of creating the ID. But
> a (longer) while ago, I remember to have seen an explanation
> of the algorithm used, but today I can't find it anymore
> (searched the Net, saxonica.com, the faq and both of your
> reference books).

You're referring of course to the Saxon algorithm - each processor can do
this its own way.

I don't think the Saxon algorithms are documented anywhere.

I'm sure Saxon used to generate consistent id's across transformation
runs along the lines of "d01e01" where d roughly meant document and e
meant element - I'm sure I used to rely (wrongly) on the consistency
and then had to create my own count after the algorithm changed -
somewhere around early version 7.  There were also (iirc) some
conversations about how "d" couldn't be consistent if the document
came from a Stream...  Maybe Abel's read those posts somewhere?

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>