"Mukul" == Mukul Gandhi <gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> writes:
Mukul> I shall try to explain my point of view.. Let's say we
Mukul> have following XML: <x> <y></y> <p> <y></y> <q> <y></y>
Mukul> </q> </p> </x> (text content can be placed anywhere as
Mukul> desired)
Mukul> If I do, <xsl:output cdata-section-elements="y" />, then
Mukul> all y elements will contain CDATA sections. This may be
Mukul> desirable in very specific cases. But it will be more
Mukul> convenient, if I am able to put CDATA section at this
Mukul> location /x/p/q/y, and not to any other y's.
Mukul> Can we achieve this (in 1.0 or 2.0)?
You could do so if you were prepared to write your own
serializer. Then you could have an extension attribute which took an
XPath expression as its value, indicating which parts of the output
tree to write as CDATA.
Not trivial though, and (I would have thought) fairly pointless.
--
Colin Adams
Preston Lancashire
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--