Hi Florent,
That's what I ended up doing, seetting a variable to "found" if any of
the <em>s matched the tokens, then testing for the variable.. It felt
dirty, but seems to be doing the trick.
Thanks,
Spencer
On 5/10/07, Florent Georges <darkman_spam(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)fr> wrote:
Spencer Tickner wrote:
> this doesn't work for my case when:
> <em>Municipal Act; Fish Protection Act</em>Bill 25;
I'd build a sequence of:
<token within-em="true/false">the actual text</token>
"by hand", dealing directly with PM/(text()|em/text()), matches()
within a recursive function, or any other way. Then just use this
sequence to build your result.
Or just wait David come with a one-liner to solve this problem ;-)
Regards,
--drkm
___________________________________________________________________________
Découvrez une nouvelle façon d'obtenir des réponses à toutes vos questions !
Profitez des connaissances, des opinions et des expériences des internautes sur
Yahoo! Questions/Réponses
http://fr.answers.yahoo.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--