On Mon, 21 May 2007 07:23:19 -0600, bryan rasmussen
<rasmussen(_dot_)bryan(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Also I don't remember reading that it was a 2.0 implementation at all.
In fact if it were, that would be pretty amazing. an order of
magnitude more amazing than just an XSLT implementation I think.
It doesn't. It provides about 50-60% of the XSLT 1.0 spec.
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
http://mdavid.name | http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
http://dev.aol.com/blog/3155
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--