Legend, thanks mate.
Thanks to Michael too =)
- Dave
David Carlisle wrote:
However, using elements:
<xsl:element name="xhtml:ul">
...
</xsl:element>
Produces '<xhtml:ul>...</xhtml:ul>' in the output XML.
which (assuming you have the right namespace bound to xhtml:) is the
same thing, and it will render correctly in a system that is rendering
xhtml (eg firefox or opera, if you are serving it as
application/xhtml+xml) However it isn't DTD-valid (because DTD don't
know about namespaces) and it won't render on a system like IE which
knows nothing about XHTML and just renders the file as HTML by ignoring
small syntactic differences like /> empty element syntax, but falling
over large syntactic differences like prefixes.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--