On 7/25/07, Steve <subsume(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
...I read and replied to what you quoted. In reply I provided the
template I have, its usage in context, and my expected output.I also
replied with my processor, etc. If something else was expected it was
my mistake.
Steve,
I repeat myself here.
In case one gets such requests continuously, it is good to try to
write any future message providing the information that was missing
from previous messages -- not to repeat the same over and over again.
Doing this will make everybody happy:
1. You -- because tryinhg to better formulate and think over a
problem often leads to solving it without extra help.
2. People, who could reply -- less time to spend, no guessing,
faster solution, higher productivity.
3. People, who may have questions of their own -- as your threads
start consuming significantly less bandwidth and repliers' time there
would be more bandwidth and time for solving the problems of other
people, too.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--