Hi Ken,
you're right, there's no way to express XSL-FO correctly with W3C Schema for
validation.
But I'm only trying to configure an eclipse via xml-catalog for a
xml/xsd/xslt/xsl-fo training program.
Therefore my objective is more autocompletion than validation and a W3C
Schema would be enought.
Cause there are XSL-FO 1.0 schemata available, i hope there's one for 1.1
to.
Thx!
Matze
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: G. Ken Holman [mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2007 15:02
An: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Betreff: Re: [xsl] W3C Schema for XSL-FO 1.1
At 2007-08-31 14:55 +0200, Matthias Born wrote:
did anybody know if there's a schema for xsl-fo 1.1 out there?!
If there is it isn't official or normative because W3C Schema doesn't
express the semantics needed. For example, <baslic-link> has a
requirement for exactly one of two available attributes, and this
constraint cannot be expressed using W3C Schema.
RELAX-NG Schema is sufficiently powerful enough to express the
constraints, but I haven't seen an implementation.
Given that XSL-FO engines do their own validation, what is your
objective in finding such an artefact?
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . Ken
--
Orientation in Objects GmbH
Weinheimer Str. 68
D-68309 Mannheim
http://www.oio.de
Tel. +49(0)621-71839-0
Fax +49(0)621-71839-50
Amtsgericht Mannheim
HRB 38348
Geschäftsführer: Dirk M. Sohn
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--