I know it is a dead end so please stop flogging a dead horse by mentioning it.
All I wanted was ideas on how to do something I've not done in the past and not
be spoken down to.
Also I've used 1.1 successfully in the past and it has given me the results I
expected. Also I only use it when I can't use 2.0 but have access to Saxon6. The
only reason being I never know when I might need <xsl:document />. This time I'm
going with the information given to me by the project lead and was told 1.0 or
1.1 as stated.
I do not want to continue this line of discussion and it is over for me.
Marijan (Mario) Madunic
Quoting Nick Fitzsimons <nick(_at_)nickfitz(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk>:
On 1 Oct 2007, at 18:06, Mario Madunic wrote:
Abel,
I do mean 1.1. 2.0 would be preferable but can't use it in this
project and like
to use <xsl:document />.
???
<xsl:document/> is in 1.0:
<http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt#function-document>
and as others have pointed out, given that 1.1 was only ever a work
in progress, you have no real guarantees of anything it does turning
out the way you might think...
Regards,
Nick.
--
Nick Fitzsimons
http://www.nickfitz.co.uk/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--