RE: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 Multi-level grouping

Yes, using node-name() is better, and I usually use it; I took a short-cut
on this occasion because IIRC I was using <xsl:element
name="{current-grouping-key()}"> and I wasn't sure that would work with an
xs:QName; on reflection I think it probably will.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Florent Georges [mailto:lists(_at_)fgeorges(_dot_)org] 
> Sent: 10 January 2008 21:33
> To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
> Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT 2.0 Multi-level grouping
>
> Michael Kay wrote:
>
>   Hi
>
> > <xsl:for-each-group select="*" group-by="name()">
>   I know name() is widely used as a grouping key, but I 
> wonder if we shouldn't use node-name(.) instead, to be more 
> coherent regarding namespaces handling.  The same way we 
> advice to use self::ns:name instead of name() eq 'ns:name'.
>
>   Regards,
>
> --drkm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       
> ______________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails 
> vers Yahoo! Mail http://mail.yahoo.fr
>
>
> --~------------------------------------------------------------------
> XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
> or e-mail: 
> <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
> --~--

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--