My primary concern, in this case, relates to the scope of keys. If a
key name is specified in a style sheet as some global name, I am a
little concerned that the name is context sensitive.
Your other comments seem also to be a little context sensitive.
With respect,
Steven
On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Robert Koberg wrote:
On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 18:26 -0800, Steven Ericsson-Zenith wrote:
These are recurring problems with the functional model, I understand.
What are the problems? (Perhaps your universal primitive is a little
off?)
Use something else that fits your view of reality..?
However, it would make more sense, to me at least, if the context
where more explicitly specified.
How do you imagine that to occur? How could it be more explicit?
ufff...
Steven
On Jan 26, 2008, at 4:26 PM, David Carlisle wrote:
not since surely "/" simply specifies the global processing scope
in
any case.
/ denotes the root of the current document, of which you have two.
when processing test.xml / denotes the root of that file, and when
processing include.xml it denotes the root of that.
If you want to refer to the root of a different document you can not
use
/ you must store the document node in a variable, or refer t it
via a
function such as doc().
David
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--