Michael Kay wrote:
Intuitively, and simply, the functional aggregator of "keys"
would aggregate each value it encounters
What do you mean by 'encounter'?
and what do you mean by "functional aggregator", what do you
mean by "keys", and what do you mean by "intuitively"?
Exactly :-).
I think that it can be disapointing, when discovering key(), that it
doesn't handle several documents automagically. But I am convinced
that if we try to define exactly how we would like it to behave in case
of several documents (in general and with a minimum desire for
efficiency), in particular the question "what should it return?", then
the WG's choices become more clear.
Regards,
--drkm
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ne gardez plus qu'une seule adresse mail ! Copiez vos mails vers Yahoo! Mail
http://mail.yahoo.fr
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--