I thank you all for your patience in any case, it was most
instructive. It is good to find that XSL has such great defenders. :-)
And I was a little unreasonable.
I do wonder, for my own sake in the design of my projects, how I am to
structure multiple documents and document extensions. This discussion
has shown me that a meta structure may be necessary - I shall have to
experiment a little.
With respect,
Steven
On Jan 28, 2008, at 2:31 AM, Michael Kay wrote:
I do appear to have misunderstood something - I understood
this list was actually looking for constructive criticism of
the XSL language for future developments.
This list is fine as place to find out whether other users agree
with you or
whether you've got the wrong end of the stick; but the place to
provide
feedback on W3C language specifications is the address given in the
status
section of the relevant Recommendation.
Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--