and making the input environment XSLT/XPath
type aware doesn't appear logical to me.
It's actually very common that you want to pass (for example) a document
node rather than a string, and I think it's reasonable to declare this
using as= on the xsl:param declaration.
I also think that saxon's options of only allowing document nodes or
untyped values (that is, essentially strings) is reasonable for a
command line system, but in programming API it wouuld be quite
reasonable to pass in element nodes or other structured values, such as
sequences of atomic values as parameters.
Actually I didn't understand Colin's statement that you couldn't use as=
in this context, Colin, did you mean that was a restriction in the
language or just of gesalt?
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--