On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Colin Adams
<colinpauladams(_at_)googlemail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 25/03/2008, bryan rasmussen <rasmussen(_dot_)bryan(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com>
wrote:
> Is there some reason why Gestalt would be easily transferable to Firefox
I forsee no problems.
> I supposed that being implemented in Eiffel it would be more
> problematic than a java based one?
Less so, I would have thought. Since there is no virtual machine
involved, there is no worries about which version of the JVM is
implemented in Firefox.
I intend to write a C wrapper to the Gestalt API. This will then be
usable from PHP, Python, Ruby etc. Then all I need to do for Firefox
is to implement the C++ class and forward calls to the C wrapper.
just wondering; how would someone who downloads firefox source then
compile .... u can't expect people to depend on a pre-compiled binary,
on the other hand I can't see mozilla follks wanting to add an Eiffel
compile step as a dependency. making apologies now for my Eiffel
ignorance ;)
and to make my question a bit more XSLT related .... do u have any
formal XSLT performance benchmarks for gestalt ?
cheers, Jim Fuller
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--