On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu(_at_)as-guides(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's
> non-conformance
What I posted in a parallel thread
http://www.biglist.com/cgi-bin/wilma/wilma_hiliter/xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com/200804/msg00515.html?line=8#hilite
may well turn out to be such a non-conformance.
Regards,
Manfred
2008/4/30 Colin Adams <colinpauladams(_at_)googlemail(_dot_)com>:
On 30/04/2008, Michael Ludwig <mlu(_at_)as-guides(_dot_)com> wrote:
I'd still be interested to know if (a) there is more to LibXSLT's
> non-conformance and (b) if there is anything like a test suite in
> order to determine a processor's degree of conformance.
There is a test suite.
I am not familiar with the XSLT 1.0 test suite though, so I can't say
how well it catches non-coformance, other than to say it cannot be
infallible.
I am familiar with the 2.0 test suite, but this is only accessible to
W3C members and invited experts.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--