On Sun, 18 May 2008 08:45:06 -0600, M. David Peterson
<m(_dot_)david(_at_)xmlhacker(_dot_)com> wrote:
Sure. But instead of attempting to make two incompatible formats
compatible, as per my follow-up comment to Robert, why not use an XPath
abstraction layer to make that happen?
In case this conversation sways to far away from XSLT, I've posted a
follow-up to my previous post
@http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2008/05/jesper_tverskovxsllist_more_on.html.
For this interested in the non-XSLT related side of this conversation,
might I suggest we pick up the conversation via the comments section of
the same linked post?
--
/M:D
M. David Peterson
Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
Email: m(_dot_)david(_at_)3rdandUrban(_dot_)com |
m(_dot_)david(_at_)amp(_dot_)fm
Mobile: (206) 999-0588
http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--