OK, EVERYBODY OUT OF THE POOL!
This discussion has just crossed the line into clearly non-useful
territory. Discussion of how XSLT might be improved, when it is or is
not an appropriate tool, and who to deploy XSLT are useful. But
discussion of whether XSLT is or is not a "real programming language"
and incendiary without being enlightening.
That's enough of that!
-- Tommie
>> Maybe you've heard of a language called XSLT? Or XQuery? :-)
Cheap shot. :) Besides, I meant real programming languages, not a faux
functional LISP wannabe in XML guise, with no OO, so there!
Warning: you are starting a big flame here: XML *is* a real
programming language as are Haskell, Lisp, OCaml, F#, ..., etc.
--
======================================================================
B. Tommie Usdin
mailto:btusdin(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Phone: 301/315-9631
Suite 207 Direct Line: 301/315-9634
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in XML and SGML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--