G. Ken Holman wrote:
At 2008-10-21 14:50 +0200, Florent Georges wrote:
"G. Ken Holman" wrote:
> > What is the best approach for this problem?
> I would implement the sub-tables as individual tables.
Thanks for your answer. I will experiment with this approach.
> Since gaps are table-wide properties, I think embedding tables
> is best
Which property can I use to set the gap width?
The shorthand is: border-spacing="<length> <length>?"
- the first specifies the separation in the inline-progression direction
- that applies to the block-progression direction unless overridden
with the second
The longhand is: border-separation.inline-progression-direction="<length>"
border-separation.block-progression-direction="<length>"
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xsl11-20041216/#border-spacing
The lengths specify the distance that separates adjacent cell borders.
If one length is specified, it gives both the horizontal and vertical
spacing. If two are specified, the first gives the horizontal spacing
and the second the vertical spacing. Lengths may not be negative.
It seems to be a lazy mans charter. Type as much as you need to get
what you want.
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-xsl11-20041216/#border-separation
lets you name both.
Subtly different, shorthand vs full!
regards
regards
--
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--