Mukul Gandhi wrote:
Thanks a lot for a nice explanation.
I explained my thinking, not the truth - sorry...
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Ronan Klyne
<ronan(_dot_)klyne(_at_)groupbc(_dot_)com> wrote:
X[(_at_)a='hi'][(_at_)b='hi..']
If X[(_at_)a='hi'] matches a node, then that node will become the context
node when evaluating [(_at_)b='hi..']
I was thinking today, that for evaluating [(_at_)a='hi'] and [(_at_)b='hi..']
context node would be same (i.e., X). I was wrong, as you say ...
No, you're right, I was wrong, as Andrew pointed out.
# r
--
Ronan Klyne
Business Collaborator Developer
Tel: +44 01189 028518
ronan(_dot_)klyne(_at_)groupbc(_dot_)com
www.groupbc.com
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--