I think it's slightly difficult (though not impossible) to process
with XSLT, a very mixed kind of content model with XSLT.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:12 PM, Michael Ludwig <mlu(_at_)as-guides(_dot_)com>
wrote:
I really liked the way Wendell Piez put it a while ago on this list:
XSLT, especially XSLT 1.0, is at its best when the incoming data
is well designed. When it isn't, one has to call on more advanced
techniques such as processing text nodes explicitly. Of course,
XSLT also exerts a gravitational pull on XML semantics, such that
well-designed XML comes to be the XML that XSLT can handle without
fuss. -- Wendell Piez, 30.09.2008, XSL-List
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--