On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Mukul Gandhi
<gandhi(_dot_)mukul(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Dimitre Novatchev
<dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
It seems to me that for code that is heavily expressed within
XPath 2.0 expressions, the tool presented by Mukul is of limited use
only.
I agree with this. The tool I posted checks for quality of XSLT code,
and not much the XPath code.
But this so called "XPath code" *is* in fact XSLT code.
--
Cheers,
Dimitre Novatchev
---------------------------------------
Truly great madness cannot be achieved without significant intelligence.
---------------------------------------
To invent, you need a good imagination and a pile of junk
-------------------------------------
Never fight an inanimate object
-------------------------------------
You've achieved success in your field when you don't know whether what
you're doing is work or play
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--