<h>
<xsl:copy-of select="descendant::node()"/>
</h>
you (almost never) want to do that: copying descendants has a
predicatable but "strange" effect on a document tree.
If it was
<h1>this <em> and <code>that</code></em>.</h1>
then you'll get
<h1>this <em> and <code>that</code> and<code>that</code> that.</h1>
which isn't usually (or ever) what you want, with exponential expansion,
the more deeply nested the input the more copies you get in the result.
This also looks strange:
<xsl:template match="element()|comment()|processing-instruction()" mode="group">
<xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/>
</xsl:template>
don't you want the identity template here, otherwise you're never going
to apply templates to most nodes as faras I can see. copy-of stops the
apply-template processing.
something like
<xsl:template match="node(0" mode="group">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:copy-of select="@* except @the-attributes-you dont-want"/>
<xsl:apply-templates mode="group"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--