It is advisable not to use XSLT 1.1 as this language version never
became a W3C standard.
If you see this document, http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt11/ it's mentioned here,
"As of 24 August 2001 no further work on this draft is expected. The
work on XSLT 2.0 identified a number of issues with the approaches
being pursued in this document; solutions to the requirements of XSLT
1.1 will be considered in the development of XSLT 2.0 [XSLT20REQ]".
At this point of time, one should use XSLT 1.0 or XSLT 2.0 as both
these language versions are now W3C standards, and widely supported in
products.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Grahn, Karl-Johan
<Karl-Johan(_dot_)Grahn(_at_)sonyericsson(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi Mike,
in XSLT 1.1 using Saxon:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
version="1.1">
<xsl:template match="/">
<xsl:apply-templates/>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="cds">
<xsl:document href="cds.xml">
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:document>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="artists">
<xsl:document href="artists.xml">
<xsl:copy-of select="."/>
</xsl:document>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Regards,
Karl-Johan Grahn
--
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--