xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] AltovaXML and fragment identifier

2009-03-17 12:38:23

I wrote

, however a system is
allowed to reject any URI at all and if it chooses to reject all uri
with fragids passed to doc() or document() it can do that, but it should
raise [err:FODC0005]. 

which is false. It's true for doc() (which was what I was reading)  but
for document() the spec explictly says that the fragment identifier
should be stripped off and used after retrieval.

So 

document('test2009031701.xml#f1')

is the same as

document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')

or


document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')


or an error, depending on various factors....



So, I don't thinl the system is correct if it raises an error for
test2009031701.xml#f1 but not for test2009031701.xml.

David

________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--