David Carlisle schrieb:
If this nice behaviour is mandatory in 2.0, could you provide a
pointer to the part of the spec saying so? (I couldn't find it.)
http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20/#document
[quotes snipped]
then
document('test2009031701.xml#f1')
is explictly defined to work like
document('test2009031701.xml')/id('f1')
in XSLT 2.0
Thanks. I had read the parts of the spec you quoted but hadn't
understood how they would explictly define the former invocation
to work like the latter. But I believe you they do, of course!
(And I can see some implementations do so as well.)
Michael Ludwig
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--