On 4/23/2009 1:35 PM, Hintz, David L wrote:
Thanks, Ken! I should have been clearer in my description. Each <a1> and
<a2> should be paired, even though there may be intervening tags. However,
an <a2> without its paired <a1> should not be processed. I'll try your
grouping solution.
At 2009-04-23 16:23 -0400, Hintz, David L wrote:
Now I see that I over-simplified the problem. The XSLT also has to
suppress any <a1> that is not paired with an <a2>.
In the case of
<a1/>
<b/>
<a1/>
<c/>
<a2/>
which <a1/> do you want to suppress?
Just curious. It seems like the requirement is still ill-defined, but
maybe that's just me.
Would it be possible to use XML structure for pairing, as in
<a>
<b />
</a>
instead of
<a1/>
<b/>
<a2/>
?
That allow you to leverage the pairing facilities that XML offers natively.
Lars
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--