Am 21.12.2009 um 12:33 schrieb Anil Kumar Veeramalli:
do you think is this good approach?
No. It seems to fulfill a short-term request but it is going to fail soon.
Because as soon as any extra requirement appears (and they usually do), you are
stuck. Whether it is the leading "+", additional digits in parentheses, a
different international digit grouping, or the separation of country/city/local
parts of the number. Especially the latter would be fun, because you would have
to calculate the full-form "number" from individual parts... in Germany we have
city code with 3…6 digits plus local "numbers" ranging from 3…8 digits. Hey,
and what about vanity numbers...
Try a more solid approach. Even though we call it a telephone "number" it is
not a numeric, like every computer likes to treat it.
Good luck,
- Michael Müller-Hillebrand
--
_______________________________________________________________
Michael Müller-Hillebrand: Dokumentations-Technologie
Adobe Certified Expert, FrameMaker
Lösungen und Training, FrameScript, XML/XSL, Unicode
Blog: http://cap-studio.de/ - Tel. +49 (9131) 28747
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--