By the way, I'm not against a 2.0 solution. Is there one?
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 2:37 AM, David Carlisle
<davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> wrote:
On 25/02/2010 05:15, Karl Stubsjoen wrote:
Looking for XSL 1.0 solution.
oops sorry missed that. The one I posted was xslt 2.
in that case you need an extension function giving access to an html parser.
David
________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs.
________________________________________________________________________
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--