At 2010-03-17 10:52 +0530, byomokesh wrote:
What is the difference between XSL:FO create PDF and InDesign creation PDF.
A quick summary, I think, would be that XSL-FO is focused on the flow
of content while InDesign is focused on the page.
Which is good Quality?
I want to know only Quality wise.
Quality varies based on the vendor, not on the technology. With
XSL-FO rendering I see quality differences between free and
commercial XSL-FO engines running the identical XSL-FO instance. The
commercial engines I've used are very close and are practically
interchangeable, but the free engines don't compare.
I've seen some impressive output from InDesign, but I wouldn't want
to use it on the project I did for 3 million pages of paper in a
single run (60,000 customized 50-page booklets).
Because the two technologies address different user requirements, I
think it is impossible to answer your question. Use whichever
technology meets your needs.
I hope this helps.
. . . . . . . . . . . . Ken
--
XSLT/XQuery training: San Carlos, California 2010-04-26/30
Principles of XSLT for XQuery Writers: San Francisco,CA 2010-05-03
XSLT/XQuery training: Ottawa, Canada 2010-05-10/14
XSLT/XQuery/UBL/Code List training: Trondheim,Norway 2010-06-02/11
Vote for your XML training: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07 http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/bc
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--