Hi again,
At 01:09 PM 4/13/2010, David wrote:
<!-- david C-s ideal world The above woul dnot be an error and
group-starting-with would take an expression not a match, and the
group would start whenever the expression was true.
so to do nodes you would have to do self::h2 as in the group-by example
(or with exists() for extra clarity rather than relying on implict
boolean conversion)
<grouping-nodes-without-reordering>
<xsl:for-each-group select="$x/*" group-starting-with="exists(self::h2)">
<group>
<xsl:copy-of select="current-group()"/>
</group>
</xsl:for-each-group>
</grouping-nodes-without-reordering>
-->
Mm yes, but despite my agreeing with the basic premise, only a
mathematician is likely to find this more straightforward than
group-starting-with="h2". At least most of the time.
It's when we start thinking about the actual semantics that things
get more complicated.
Cheers,
Wendell
======================================================================
Wendell Piez
mailto:wapiez(_at_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Mulberry Technologies, Inc. http://www.mulberrytech.com
17 West Jefferson Street Direct Phone: 301/315-9635
Suite 207 Phone: 301/315-9631
Rockville, MD 20850 Fax: 301/315-8285
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mulberry Technologies: A Consultancy Specializing in SGML and XML
======================================================================
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--