xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Iteration of for() for first 100 intergers.

2010-11-18 14:42:30
In XPath 1.0

you're out of luck. There's a workaround to iterate over a node-set
containing n nodes, and use position().

See 1b in this document for enhancements of that technique by Wendel Piez:
http://www.xml.org//sites/www.xml.org/files/xslt_efficient_programming_techniques.pdf


Mit besten Gruessen / Best wishes,

Hermann Stamm-Wilbrandt
Developer, XML Compiler, L3
Fixpack team lead
WebSphere DataPower SOA Appliances
----------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294



From:       Michael Kay <mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com>
To:         xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Date:       11/18/2010 05:22 PM
Subject:    Re: [xsl] Iteration of for() for first 100 intergers.



On 18/11/2010 16:09, ram wrote:
Hi,
    I am looking for simple for() which will iterate through first 100
numbers.   how can i do that.

for(int i=0;i<=100;i++){
    System.out.println("each value"+i);
}

In XPath 2.0:

for $i in 1 to 100 return .....

In XPath 1.0

you're out of luck. There's a workaround to iterate over a node-set
containing n nodes, and use position().

Michael Kay
Saxonica

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--




--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>