Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces
2011-04-20 13:05:11
Hi Abel,
I appreciate your contributions to this list as well as those of many
others. I have indeed been subscribing for some time and I really wish
to also contribute, even if only in my own way.
On 20-4-2011 17:42, ac wrote:
As you say, I may be wrong, but I get the feeling that with 40 years
of development and over ten in XSLT, a stylesheet of over 20K lines,
or more specifically an integrated set of 25 stylesheets with an
average of 1000 lines each, using around 80 namespaces to manage over
a terabyte of XML elements, under many XML-based standards, in
parallel transformation pipelines, to do Knowledge Resource
Entitlement, Modeling, Management, and Sharing, I, at least, can make
out the difference between a namespace prefix and its URI.
If we got diverted by new, yet irrelevant information, than please,
why not simply guide us back to the issue at hand. I know people that
have even more impressive numbers in their resumé, yet still happen to
make architctural or other mistakes. That's just human. As it is also
human that we all try to contribute and learn from these discussions.
I have been trying to refocus, probably on every reply. The last one
was another attempt and summary.
Maybe I can't write, or maybe I am just plainly and simply wrong
whatsoever, or maybe this is a list for newbie issues, but in any
case, I am sorry that we are all unfortunately wasting valuable energy.
You've been on this list for quite some time, if I recall correctly,
so I'm sure you know better than this. Don't blame this on yourself.
Asking clear questions is equally hard as giving clear answers and
it's easy to become misguided. We're all trying to help.
Misunderstandings are just as human as anything else. I've had my own
share of misunderstood questions, and answers. It just happens and all
we can do is trying to guide the discussion back on track.
I don't know the track, to be honest, I lost it along the lines. If
your question is not answered, than by all means, let's try to
(re-)understand your question.
From the new incoming messages that I am reading, it may be happening.
It was not so much a question, as while trying to contribute to an
answer, I tried to introduce a forward looking exchange issue.
Thank you.
Regards,
Andre
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, (continued)
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Jirka Kosek
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Michel Hendriksen
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Jirka Kosek
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Jirka Kosek
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Abel Braaksma
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Abel Braaksma
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces,
ac <=
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Wendell Piez
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
- [xsl] Another Example [Was: Namespaces], Geert Bormans
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Brandon Ibach
- Message not available
- Re: [xsl] Another Example [Was: Namespaces], ac
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Florent Georges
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Andrew Welch
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, Wendell Piez
- Re: Was: [xsl] mode and moved to Namespaces, ac
Re: [xsl] mode, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex
|
|
|