xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] random url for namespace to avoid uncontrollable dependencies

2011-08-25 09:02:03
On 25 August 2011 14:47, David Carlisle <davidc(_at_)nag(_dot_)co(_dot_)uk> 
wrote:
On 25/08/2011 14:31, Dirk wrote:

No problems at all, use whatever namespace you like.  You could just
use xmlns:cms="cms", it really doesn't matter.  Just don't put dates
or version numbers in it, or anything that might give you reason to
want to change it down the line.

Note however that due to a (rather perverse) decision of the w3c, such
namespaces (which are technically relative URI) are deprecated.

http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xppa

following that decision later editions of the xml namespace spec have
declared relative url namespaces deprecated and referenced that page.

I'm not sure what that is saying - the namespace name is still
'../name'... where does any resolution to an absolute uri take place?


-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--