Right. I take that note.
I am also noticing that disable-output-escaping is deprecated in XSLT2.0, so I
guess I shall try and figure out another way of doing this...
Trond
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Kay [mailto:mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com]
Sent: 30. august 2012 14:37
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] Replace content of element, then transform it...
One of the main reasons that we've been telling people for 12 years not to use
disable-output-escaping is that it couples the transformation too closely to
the serialization, meaning it's difficult and inefficient to reuse your code as
part of a pipeline. A lot depends on what this d-o-e stuff is really doing.
Having said that, from the information supplied I don't know why you are
getting the error you are.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 30/08/2012 12:08, trond(_dot_)huso(_at_)ntb(_dot_)no wrote:
Hi,
I have the following XSLT.
<xsl:template match="body">
<body>
<xsl:value-of select="." disable-output-escaping="yes"/>
</body>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="leadtext">
<leadtext>
<xsl:value-of select="." disable-output-escaping="yes"/>
</leadtext>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="node()|@*">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
Which does what is intended. Just that I want to not output it, but start w=
orking on it in a phase-two process.
So I tried this
<xsl:template match="body">
<body>
<xsl:value-of select="." disable-output-escaping="yes"/>
</body>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="leadtext">
<leadtext>
<xsl:value-of select="." disable-output-escaping="yes"/>
</leadtext>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="node()|@*">
<xsl:variable name="foo">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|@*"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:variable>
<xsl:apply-templates select="$foo" mode="phase2" />
</xsl:template>
<!-- Error message:
Description: Cannot create an attribute node (id) whose parent is a
documen= t node
-->
After reading about how this works, I now understand why I am getting the e=
rror. Is there another alternative to make this possible in one document, o=
r do I have to send the output to a new document?
Best regards,
Trond Husø
System Developer
Mobile : +47 450 35 715
E-mail : trond(_dot_)huso(_at_)ntb(_dot_)no
www.ntb.no
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail:
<mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--