xsl-list
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Does <xsl:copy> use a lot of memory? Is there an alternative that is more efficient?

2012-09-03 10:15:18
On 03/09/2012 17:12, Costello, Roger L. wrote:
However, the element that I just inlined may have a reference. So I
store the results into a variable and then repeat the process on the
content of the variable.

Why?

Why copy the whole thing rather than just apply templates and follow references as you go?

I don't see why you need any local storage or variables at all.
--

David

google plus: https:/profiles.google.com/d.p.carlisle



________________________________________________________________________
The Numerical Algorithms Group Ltd is a company registered in England
and Wales with company number 1249803. The registered office is:
Wilkinson House, Jordan Hill Road, Oxford OX2 8DR, United Kingdom.

This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The service is
powered by MessageLabs. ________________________________________________________________________

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>