On 01/03/2013 11:02, Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex wrote:
On 01.03.2013 11:40, Michael Kay wrote:
(b) they wanted to exclude anything that didn't make sense in an
international Unicode context (so things like word boundaries were
immediately suspect)
If they had been concerned about what is a word constituent and what
is not in a certain language, they wouldn’t have included \w and \W in
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#cces
You're assuming a rational and logical process. You clearly haven't
worked on a standards committee.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--