At 2013-04-04 20:22 -0700, Dan Vint wrote:
Thanks, I can see that argument. but now you open a can of worms for
me. So say your template for b just writes output to the standard
result tree (not separate files). Why doesn't the same argument for
parallelism apply there?
It is sitting in memory waiting to be rearranged.
Probably answering my own question here, I'm guessing the difference
is writing to a file more or less serially vs writing to a tree. The
processor can write to multiple locations in the tree and keep track
of where multiple b outputs should be created, but not as well
supported writing to a file from multiple sources (unless your
willing to live with jumbled results in the file).
I couldn't have said it better myself.
Good luck in your project!
. . . . . . . . . Ken
--
Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training |
Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm |
Crane Softwrights Ltd. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
G. Ken Holman mailto:gkholman(_at_)CraneSoftwrights(_dot_)com
|
Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about |
Legal business disclaimers: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal |
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--