Radu,
Regarding your "In conclusion" paragraph, is this for the
transformation under discussion, or are you speaking more generally?
The reason I ask is that at one time oXygen's default behavior was to
disable byte-code generation. If that is still the case, wouldn't a
use also need to enable byte-code generation in order to get similar
performance?
I use oXygen and typically load a completely empty configuration file
as a "custom" config. This typically makes my scripts run about twice
as quickly compared to default oXygen behavior owing to the generation
of byte-code.
-David
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Radu Pisoi <radu_pisoi(_at_)sync(_dot_)ro>
wrote:
In conclusion, without showing the output in the result view and by
disabling the schema-aware validation you will get the same execution time
when running the transformation from oXygen and from the command line.
Regards,
Radu
--
"A false conclusion, once arrived at and widely accepted is not
dislodged easily, and the less it is understood, the more tenaciously
it is held." - Cantor's Law of Preservation of Ignorance.
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--