On 11 Mar 2014, at 15:12, David Rudel <fwqhgads(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Radu,
Regarding your "In conclusion" paragraph, is this for the
transformation under discussion, or are you speaking more generally?
The reason I ask is that at one time oXygen's default behavior was to
disable byte-code generation. If that is still the case, wouldn't a
use also need to enable byte-code generation in order to get similar
performance?
I use oXygen and typically load a completely empty configuration file
as a "custom" config. This typically makes my scripts run about twice
as quickly compared to default oXygen behavior owing to the generation
of byte-code.
-David
Interesting. I would have assumed that for many oXygen scenarios, the extra
compile-time cost of generating bytecode didn't justify the run-time benefits;
but that's in the absence of any measurements.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--